QC is not a CI tool. It’s more like an additional layer of more thorough unit testing that could (depending on their terms) run by our existing CI solutions.
I’d be in favour of looking at how we can make it work! Best Jan -- On 11 Jun 2014, at 13:06 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: > n Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> quickcheck made quickcheck-ci available for free for open-sources projects: >> >> http://quickcheck-ci.com/ >> >> It would be interresting to use it for couchdb imo. Thoughts? > > If we still use Travis, we already have 2 CI instances, and they have > not been able to prevent drawn out release processes like the one for > 1.6.0. Unless we somehow think this will magically solve all our CI > needs, I'd prefer to instead spend time on improving other parts of > the CI we already have. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
