> On 17 Mar 2015, at 19:07, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm, why not combine them? > > So far, our lists have been split on activity type, not by code > submodule. I think that's the right approach. > > So, dev@ as a default, but with a strong focus on the Erlang side of > things, marketing@ for everything from promotion through to brand, > l10n@ for anything to do with translation, etc. > > Instead of having two front-end lists for different front-end > projects, let's have one place for front-end people. That could be > used for anything from Futon, Fauxton, our main website, or anything > else front-end-y
Because they are very different topics and the fauxton traffic is already suffocating (not complaining, keep up the good work! :) and I fear that it just drowns out the website tech stuff. > My concern is that we already have quite a lot of lists, and while I > think it's good that we've been in an expansionist phase, the downside > is that each list balkanises conversation. I think your earlier analysis of creating a comfortable space is the advantage here. Best Jan -- > > On 17 March 2015 at 18:59, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Fauxton is also getting a separate list. Thanks for reminding me, that's for >> the other thread. Although I wouldn't mix that in with the website dev bits. >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >>> On 17.03.2015, at 18:55, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Oh, hmm. When you put it like that. I guess it was felt that dev@ was >>> too crowded by Erlang stuff and not that friendly to front-end people. >>> Hmm. Perhaps we can expand the remit of the list to cover Futon >>> development then? It would be super cool to make the project more >>> welcoming / easy to contribute to for front-end devs who don't give >>> two figs about Erlang. >>> >>>> On 17 March 2015 at 18:52, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I believe this is more for the web-dev side, less the content. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Jan >>>> -- >>>> >>>>> On 17 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Robert, who is "we"? This references as discussion that I can't find >>>>> on the list anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> Also, bit late to the party here, but why do we need a separate www@ >>>>> list? This seems like marketing@ wheelhouse to me. Can't we just >>>>> discuss the redesign there? The website is, in the overall scheme of >>>>> things, a relatively minor (in terms of activity, but hugely important >>>>> in terms of impact) component of the project. (We don't have mailing >>>>> lists for each of our repositories, for instance, and they are worked >>>>> on far more frequently.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 18 February 2015 at 22:45, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi list, >>>>>> >>>>>> we are planning to introduce a new website ailing list for all work >>>>>> regarding http://couchdb.apache.org/ for all things related to the >>>>>> website. >>>>>> >>>>>> If nobody objects I would send the request to Infra in the next days. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Robert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Noah Slater >>>>> https://twitter.com/nslater >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: >>>> http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Noah Slater >>> https://twitter.com/nslater > > > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater -- Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
