Should we add www@ to the homepage? If so, what description? On 17 March 2015 at 22:06, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 17 Mar 2015, at 19:07, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hmm, why not combine them? >> >> So far, our lists have been split on activity type, not by code >> submodule. I think that's the right approach. >> >> So, dev@ as a default, but with a strong focus on the Erlang side of >> things, marketing@ for everything from promotion through to brand, >> l10n@ for anything to do with translation, etc. >> >> Instead of having two front-end lists for different front-end >> projects, let's have one place for front-end people. That could be >> used for anything from Futon, Fauxton, our main website, or anything >> else front-end-y > > Because they are very different topics and the fauxton traffic is already > suffocating (not complaining, keep up the good work! :) and I fear that it > just drowns out the website tech stuff. > > >> My concern is that we already have quite a lot of lists, and while I >> think it's good that we've been in an expansionist phase, the downside >> is that each list balkanises conversation. > > I think your earlier analysis of creating a comfortable space is the > advantage here. > > Best > Jan > -- > > > > > > > >> >> On 17 March 2015 at 18:59, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Fauxton is also getting a separate list. Thanks for reminding me, that's >>> for the other thread. Although I wouldn't mix that in with the website dev >>> bits. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>>> On 17.03.2015, at 18:55, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh, hmm. When you put it like that. I guess it was felt that dev@ was >>>> too crowded by Erlang stuff and not that friendly to front-end people. >>>> Hmm. Perhaps we can expand the remit of the list to cover Futon >>>> development then? It would be super cool to make the project more >>>> welcoming / easy to contribute to for front-end devs who don't give >>>> two figs about Erlang. >>>> >>>>> On 17 March 2015 at 18:52, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I believe this is more for the web-dev side, less the content. >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Jan >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>> On 17 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Robert, who is "we"? This references as discussion that I can't find >>>>>> on the list anywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, bit late to the party here, but why do we need a separate www@ >>>>>> list? This seems like marketing@ wheelhouse to me. Can't we just >>>>>> discuss the redesign there? The website is, in the overall scheme of >>>>>> things, a relatively minor (in terms of activity, but hugely important >>>>>> in terms of impact) component of the project. (We don't have mailing >>>>>> lists for each of our repositories, for instance, and they are worked >>>>>> on far more frequently.) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 18 February 2015 at 22:45, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi list, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we are planning to introduce a new website ailing list for all work >>>>>>> regarding http://couchdb.apache.org/ for all things related to the >>>>>>> website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If nobody objects I would send the request to Infra in the next days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Robert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Noah Slater >>>>>> https://twitter.com/nslater >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: >>>>> http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Noah Slater >>>> https://twitter.com/nslater >> >> >> >> -- >> Noah Slater >> https://twitter.com/nslater > > -- > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >
-- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
