Github user benkeen commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/434#issuecomment-106462115
  
    @wadsashika that's a fair point. But I wouldn't worry: I don't think any of 
the points I make above are actual bugs, just stylistic. And none are 
particularly egregious, I'm just giving you a hard time because you're new and 
hey, that's my job here. ;) 
     
    Internally, we mix and match who reviews who's code, and everyone has their 
own viewpoints. That's the awesome part about code reviews: you always get 
feedback that you won't have thought of, and everyone's different. So you're 
right, some of these things are already in the code but I wouldn't worry too 
much about it. We work as a group. And of course: you're always welcome to 
disagree! If Michelle or Robert were here in Vancouver, I'm pretty sure I'd 
have demanded settling an argument by an arm wrestle or something.
    
    @michellephung, @robertkowalski that's a fair point Robert. But yeah I'm 
not averse keeping the widget separate for the moment. Once it's a little more 
settled we could look at extracting shared code if there are big chunks. The 
parts I looked at looked like just pieces here and there, which isn't so bad. 



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to