Right, good point, Alexander. In that case, I would say, let's not do an actual GitHub "transfer." There are only a few tickets. I think we could move the key ones over by hand ourselves; and in the fullness of time, it won't much matter.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Robert Kowalski <r...@kowalski.gd> wrote: > Yes > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kowalski <r...@kowalski.gd> > wrote: > > > 3. Can you chime in at [1] ? Can you open the link? I basically asked > > infra > > > if we can have Github issues enabled in all our subprojects and if they > > can > > > migrate nano for us together with issues, wiki, closed/open/prs etc. If > > you > > > can not open the link, please ping me! > > > > That's only possible if you'll transfer original GH nano repository to > > Apache GH account. This also means that current couchdb-nano have to > > be removed. > > > > -- > > ,,,^..^,,, > > >
