Thanks Alexander! > Am 25.01.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Clemens! > > My own opinion below: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Clemens Stolle > <clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote: >> - Should we use ubuntu and the PPA instead of building from source? The >> ubuntu base image is 60MB bigger than debian's. > > We don't provide any PPA builds to use, especially for 2.0, today. > Ubuntu vs debian - doesn't matter for me.
I was referring to this PPA https://launchpad.net/~couchdb/+archive/ubuntu/stable Isn’t it maintained by the CouchDB project? I guess my question is if it were preferable to use such a pre-built package instead of building from source. > >> - Building from git branches is not feasible in official images. Are there >> tags or pre-release snapshots for 2.0? > > There was developer-preview-2.0 branch for that purpose, but it's > outdated for now and quickly becomes after each rebase. For current > state of 2.0 I don't see any point to add special intermediate tags > for reproduceable builds. > Also, it may be a bit rushy to include 2.0 image into officials as > people may accidentally thought that this version is released while > that's not true. The docker image for 2.0 is currently tagged as 2.0-dev to make it clear that it’s a developer preview. It could also be called 2.0-alpha. Maybe 2.0 isn’t ready for the official image, but it should be docker-available somewhere to ease testing. > >> - How does CouchDB handle signals? Currently couchdb doesn’t respond to >> SIGTERM. I’m not sure if this is caused by my wrapper shell script. > > SIGTERM works correctly so far. I don’t really understand why it doesn’t in the container, though. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,,
