Quick question: it looks like everyone is testing the release manually.
Have you all considered setting up something like a CI env that uses
vagrant to spin up different VMs and test everything in an automated
fashion? Sorry, if I am oversimplifying this :)

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:33 AM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1-ing my own nomination:
>
> Tested on Debian jessie, x86_64 - Erlang/JS test suites and Fauxton smoke
> tests pass.
>
> Will check Windows later today.
>
> -Joan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
> To: "CouchDB Developers" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 November, 2017 6:21:32 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.1.1-RC2
>
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 2.1.1-RC2.
>
> Changes since 2.1.1-RC1 are here:
>
>     https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/2.1.1-RC1...2.1.1-RC2
>
> Human-readable change notes are here:
>
>     http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/2.1.html#version-2-1-1
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is
> made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in!
>
> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>
>     wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.1.1/rc.2/apache-couchdb-2.1.1-RC2.tar.gz
>     wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.1.1/rc.2/apache-couchdb-2.1.1-RC2.tar.gz.asc
>     wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.1.1/rc.2/apache-couchdb-2.1.1-RC2.tar.gz.sha256
>     wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/2.1.1/rc.2/apache-couchdb-2.1.1-RC2.tar.gz.sha512
>
> Please follow the test procedure here:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>
> Please remember that "rc.2" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these
> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 2.1.1.
>
> Please cast your votes now.
>
> Thanks,
> Joan Touzet
>

Reply via email to