On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:38 AM Alex Miller <alexmil...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Apr 1, 2019, at 2:21 AM, Will Holley <willhol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 5. I have a few concerns about the performance given we'll no longer be > > able to push down filtering to the data storage tier. It sounds [1] like > a > > key thing will be the extent to which we can concurrently fetch/filter > > non-overlapping key ranges from FDB - likely something that will come up > in > > relation to views as well. This gets a bit more fun when considering > > multi-tenancy, and is perhaps something to stew on whilst getting > something > > functional together. > > > > Will > > > > [1] > https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/secondary-indexing-approaches/792/4 > > There is an open request to folk writing applications or layers that > desire predicate pushdown to please add their use case and requirements to > https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/feature-request-predicate-pushdown/954/2 > , to help guide what the eventual implementation of this feature will be. > If someone wouldn’t mind adding what Mango would need or desire, it’d be > much appreciated. Thanks Alex, I've left a summary of our use case. As I mention in the post, I think the use case that Ryan defines fits our use case pretty nicely as well.
