Oh god, please, yes. Cheers Jan —
> On 19. Jul 2019, at 20:23, Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@apache.org> wrote: > > In 2.x local replication endpoints only seem to work like in 1.x but they > do something quite confusing: instead of replicating a clustered database > they replicate a node local database on the node where the replication job > happens to run. The node were replication runs is essentially random as far > as users are concerned. So "local" replications in 2.x almost never do what > users expect. > > Over the years this confusion led to numerous question and issues raised in > the IRC channel. So the proposal is to remove support for "local" > replications from versions 3.x and up, and only support "remote" > replication endpoints. That will reduce the support and issue load as well > as replicator code size. > > What does everyone think?
