Even better, thanks for clarifying! Cheers Jan —
> On 19. Jul 2019, at 21:51, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > couchup uses URLs of the form http://127.0.0.1:5984/ and :5986 (or whatever > ports are passed in on the CLI), so this won't be an issue. > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/rel/overlay/bin/couchup#L223-L230 > > +100 > > -Joan > >> On 2019-07-19 3:02 p.m., Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> I think we left in the loophole for the couchup utility that helps folks to >> go from 1.x to 2.x, no need for that in 3.x. >> Cheers >> Jan >> — >>> On 19. Jul 2019, at 20:23, Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> In 2.x local replication endpoints only seem to work like in 1.x but they >>> do something quite confusing: instead of replicating a clustered database >>> they replicate a node local database on the node where the replication job >>> happens to run. The node were replication runs is essentially random as far >>> as users are concerned. So "local" replications in 2.x almost never do what >>> users expect. >>> >>> Over the years this confusion led to numerous question and issues raised in >>> the IRC channel. So the proposal is to remove support for "local" >>> replications from versions 3.x and up, and only support "remote" >>> replication endpoints. That will reduce the support and issue load as well >>> as replicator code size. >>> >>> What does everyone think?
