We probably don’t need fancy  Docker here. Eunit and dev/run already setup
fdbserver automatically if the binary is found. A two stage build that
copies fdbserver into the existing image is probably all that needs to
happen.

I’m limited to typing one handed for the forseeable future so I won’t get
to it myself. But i’m more than happy to chat on email or irc if someone
has questions.

Here’s build notes for macOS:

https://gist.github.com/davisp/aa6f526b8fd0441f2035c93774828798


On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:08 PM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Alex!
>
> The Jenkins setup currently runs each CI job in a container per host,
> and Docker-in-Docker can be a bit challenging. Hopefully the alternative
> "expose your parent Docker socket inside of Docker with -v" approach, as
> described at
> https://jpetazzo.github.io/2015/09/03/do-not-use-docker-in-docker-for-ci/
> will be sufficient. We'd also need the docker cli inside the CI image,
> which shouldn't be too hard to add.
>
> For builds on master itself (post-merge, to check a wider set of
> platforms), we currently have FreeBSD builds where there is no Docker.
> We'll need to sort out a solution for that as well. I can preinstall FDB
> on those hosts but the Jenkinsfile will have to take care of starting
> and stopping FDB as pre/post actions.
>
> -Joan
>
> On 2020-02-18 17:22, Alex Miller wrote:
> > And for whoever does pick it up, there's some examples of docker-ify-ing
> FDB and running it via docker-compose in apple/foundationdb's
> packaging/docker/<
> https://github.com/apple/foundationdb/tree/master/packaging/docker>  ,
> and the Dockerfile therein is built and pushed as foundationdb/foundationdb<
> https://hub.docker.com/r/foundationdb/foundationdb/tags>  on docker hub.
>

Reply via email to