In your browser, it should be your local time!? It shows me 15h, 16h and 17h… Is this correct?
Best, Ronny > Am 21.07.2022 um 17:54 schrieb Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org>: > > Hi Deni, > > I’m glad you’re on board. All times are UTC, apologies for the missing info! > > Best > Jan > — > > >> On 21. Jul 2022, at 17:34, Denitsa Burroughs <denitsa.burrou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> That's a fantastic idea. Thank you for reviving the meet-ups. I hope we can >> establish a monthly cadence. Quick question: what TZ are the times in the >> poll listed in? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Deni >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:24 PM Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> In the past we’ve done two in-person developer summits with great success, >>> both from a team-building but also from a technical discussion point of >>> view. But these were ~1/2 a decade a part and took quite a bit to organise. >>> >>> Given that meeting in-person continues to to be a pain and given that we >>> all learned how to do video calls in the past few years, I’d like to >>> propose a recurring synchronous meeting where we can discuss CouchDB’s >>> development in a different format than we do at the moment. >>> >>> There are a number of high-level features that we’d need larger input on >>> but that are have enough moving parts that it would make sense to discuss >>> face to face (via video/audio chat). >>> >>> In detail: >>> >>> - we run a monthly video/audio meeting of ~90 minute length where we can >>> hash out CouchDB development topics >>> >>> - in the beginning, I’d like to dedicate each meeting to a single topic, >>> just so we don’t get distracted too much (I have a short-list of proposals >>> for topics, but that’s for a later day, I’m sure we all do :), maybe a >>> topic needs multiple meetings, maybe we have time for two topics per >>> meeting, but let’s be clear and limited on the agenda, so everybody can >>> prepare with minimal effort >>> >>> - each topic discussed will have a reasonably complete written proposal >>> that folks can read through in preparation >>> >>> - if any one can’t make any particular meeting, no problem, there is no >>> mandatory attendance, and we are not making any project binding decisions >>> in those meetings >>> >>> - ideally, we keep decent notes so that folks can catch up, and maybe we >>> can do a recording of it all for posterity >>> >>> My suggestion would be that pick a date and time in the somewhat near >>> future and then stick to that date and time on a monthly basis. >>> >>> Since it is (northern hemisphere) summer, it is possible that you, dear >>> reader, won’t be able to attend the inaugural edition, just select >>> something that works from the next iteration onwards. >>> >>> I put up a date and time selection poll, it is aiming for late-EU and >>> early US-West compatibility since I expect that’s where most of the folks >>> are going to be: https://nuudel.digitalcourage.de/fUQFofPoezvvz9ev >>> >>> I’m looking forward to seeing you all :) >>> >>> Best >>> Jan >>> — >
