Yes, In addition to default ones On 16 September 2014 19:12, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> So the issue is that you want to be able to mark the new licenses as > approved - is that correct? > > On 16 September 2014 12:20, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > I get report like this (some lines are omitted): > > > > 0 Unknown Licenses > > > > ******************************* > > > > Unapproved licenses: > > > > > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js > > > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css > > > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css > > > > ***************************************************** > > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL > > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B > > Compressed archives will be marked A > > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N > > AL > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xsd > > AL > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xml > > B > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/default/_big_profile_pic.jpg > > ...................................... > > !MIT+GPL > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js > > ...................................... > > !MIT > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css > > ...................................... > > !MIT+GPL > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css > > ...................................... > > > > > > On 16 September 2014 18:01, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 16 September 2014 08:04, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Hello All, > >> > > >> > Sorry for the long email :( > >> > > >> > Today I added apache-rat-plugin (0.11) to our maven build ( > >> > openmeetings.apache.org project) > >> > We have couple of jQuery files in our sources licensed under MIT and > >> > MIT+GPL and not recognized by apache-rat-plugin. > >> > So I have added custom licences: > >> > <licenses> > >> > <license > >> > > >> > implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> > >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT+GPL</licenseFamilyCategory> > >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT and GPL v2</licenseFamilyName> > >> > <notes></notes> > >> > <patterns> > >> > <pattern>Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 > licenses.</pattern> > >> > </patterns> > >> > </license> > >> > <license > >> > > >> > implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> > >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT</licenseFamilyCategory> > >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT</licenseFamilyName> > >> > <notes></notes> > >> > <patterns> > >> > <pattern>Licensed MIT</pattern> > >> > </patterns> > >> > </license> > >> > </licenses> > >> > >> OK > >> > >> > <licenseFamilies> > >> > <licenseFamily > >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> > >> > <familyName>MIT and GPL v2</familyName> > >> > </licenseFamily> > >> > <licenseFamily > >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> > >> > <familyName>MIT</familyName> > >> > </licenseFamily> > >> > </licenseFamilies> > >> > >> What happens if you omit the <licenseFamilies> section? > >> > >> > Unfortunately after that Apache licensed files are not approved any > more > >> > ******************************* > >> > > >> > Unapproved licenses: > >> > > >> > pom.xml > >> > > >> > ******************************* > >> > > >> > Archives: > >> > > >> > ***************************************************** > >> > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL > >> > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B > >> > Compressed archives will be marked A > >> > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N > >> > !AL pom.xml > >> > N CHANGELOG > >> > N NOTICE > >> > N README > >> > N LICENSE > >> > > >> > > >> > adding > >> > <addDefaultLicenseMatchers>true</addDefaultLicenseMatchers> > >> > also doesn't help > >> > > >> > Is there any option to add licences to default ones? > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance > >> > > >> > -- > >> > WBR > >> > Maxim aka solomax > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
