On 16 September 2014 18:05, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I doing something wrong? > Is it possible to add approved licenses to default ones?
Does not look to be possible with the Maven plugin currently; if any licenseFamily entries are added, then the defaults don't seem to be used. I'm surprised that it works differently with the Ant task. > On 16 September 2014 20:08, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> actually it works in ant >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/branches/3.0.x/build.xml >> (search for report_rat) >> was hoping to get similar functionality with maven >> >> On 16 September 2014 19:26, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, In addition to default ones >>> >>> On 16 September 2014 19:12, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So the issue is that you want to be able to mark the new licenses as >>>> approved - is that correct? >>>> >>>> On 16 September 2014 12:20, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I get report like this (some lines are omitted): >>>> > >>>> > 0 Unknown Licenses >>>> > >>>> > ******************************* >>>> > >>>> > Unapproved licenses: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js >>>> > >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css >>>> > >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css >>>> > >>>> > ***************************************************** >>>> > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL >>>> > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B >>>> > Compressed archives will be marked A >>>> > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N >>>> > AL >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xsd >>>> > AL >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xml >>>> > B >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/default/_big_profile_pic.jpg >>>> > ...................................... >>>> > !MIT+GPL >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js >>>> > ...................................... >>>> > !MIT >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css >>>> > ...................................... >>>> > !MIT+GPL >>>> > >>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css >>>> > ...................................... >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 16 September 2014 18:01, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> On 16 September 2014 08:04, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> > Hello All, >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Sorry for the long email :( >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Today I added apache-rat-plugin (0.11) to our maven build ( >>>> >> > openmeetings.apache.org project) >>>> >> > We have couple of jQuery files in our sources licensed under MIT and >>>> >> > MIT+GPL and not recognized by apache-rat-plugin. >>>> >> > So I have added custom licences: >>>> >> > <licenses> >>>> >> > <license >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> >>>> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT+GPL</licenseFamilyCategory> >>>> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT and GPL v2</licenseFamilyName> >>>> >> > <notes></notes> >>>> >> > <patterns> >>>> >> > <pattern>Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 >>>> licenses.</pattern> >>>> >> > </patterns> >>>> >> > </license> >>>> >> > <license >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> >>>> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT</licenseFamilyCategory> >>>> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT</licenseFamilyName> >>>> >> > <notes></notes> >>>> >> > <patterns> >>>> >> > <pattern>Licensed MIT</pattern> >>>> >> > </patterns> >>>> >> > </license> >>>> >> > </licenses> >>>> >> >>>> >> OK >>>> >> >>>> >> > <licenseFamilies> >>>> >> > <licenseFamily >>>> >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> >>>> >> > <familyName>MIT and GPL v2</familyName> >>>> >> > </licenseFamily> >>>> >> > <licenseFamily >>>> >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> >>>> >> > <familyName>MIT</familyName> >>>> >> > </licenseFamily> >>>> >> > </licenseFamilies> >>>> >> >>>> >> What happens if you omit the <licenseFamilies> section? >>>> >> >>>> >> > Unfortunately after that Apache licensed files are not approved any >>>> more >>>> >> > ******************************* >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Unapproved licenses: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > pom.xml >>>> >> > >>>> >> > ******************************* >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Archives: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > ***************************************************** >>>> >> > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL >>>> >> > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B >>>> >> > Compressed archives will be marked A >>>> >> > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N >>>> >> > !AL pom.xml >>>> >> > N CHANGELOG >>>> >> > N NOTICE >>>> >> > N README >>>> >> > N LICENSE >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > adding >>>> >> > <addDefaultLicenseMatchers>true</addDefaultLicenseMatchers> >>>> >> > also doesn't help >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Is there any option to add licences to default ones? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Thanks in advance >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > WBR >>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > WBR >>>> > Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
