[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14284677#comment-14284677
]
Dan Dumont commented on RAT-190:
--------------------------------
Hi, sorry for the confusion. The issue I'm having (even with your updated
pom) is that rat is not flagging the js file in the directory.
There is no line in the pom for the license in the js file and I do not
understand why it' not rejecting it.
> False negatives(?) in apache rat license checking
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAT-190
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190
> Project: Apache Rat
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.11
> Reporter: Dan Dumont
> Attachments: complete-pom.xml, test.zip
>
>
> We're using rat to enforce our internal copyright on all of our source files.
> We're seeing it missing files that should be flagged. Here's part of our pom:
> <licenses>
> <license
> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense">
> <licenseFamilyCategory>IBMCL</licenseFamilyCategory>
> <licenseFamilyName>IBM Copyright</licenseFamilyName>
> <notes></notes>
> <patterns>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2015</pattern>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2014, 2015</pattern>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2013, 2015</pattern>
> </patterns>
> </license>
> </licenses>
> <licenseFamilies>
> <licenseFamily implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily">
> <familyName>IBM Copyright</familyName>
> </licenseFamily>
> </licenseFamilies>
> The file in question is "included" as reported by running with debug
> output... but the file's copyright is:
> /* Copyright IBM Corp. 2014 All Rights Reserved. */
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
