Hi Josh (and others), I was wondering if you had any preferences on how we go about handling changes to the User Guide (and website content in general). Is there a preference to go with a review-then-commit workflow, or commit-then-review (or something else)?
I'm assuming that at this point that there won't be any huge major additions to it, but I figure it wouldn't be bad to have a general agreement on how we want to handle editing it. FWIW, up until now the (very minor) changes I've made have just been going straight in without any review. - Gabriel
