On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Gabriel Reid <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Gabriel Reid <[email protected] > >wrote: > > I think it's worthwhile to add small sections > > incrementally-- one on unit testing, one on Scrunch, and some more code > > examples in places (like for the HBase section). My thought was that > > posting a giant markdown file for the new user guide wasn't a good use of > > my/everyone else's time, but posting diffs first should cut down on > > conflicts. Did you have sections you were planning to add, too? > > > > Ok, sounds good. > > The main thing that I was thinking of adding in the short term was > some explanation around holding onto references (i.e. > PType#getDetachedValue), as well as potentially adding some stuff on > unit testing and/or integration testing (although if you're working on > that already I'll happily leave it over to you!) > +1 to the getDetachedValue stuff-- that's important. I'll get a unit/integration testing draft posted as a patch by Sunday. > > > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > I'm still good with commit-then-review for the website, although we > have > >> > slowly moved towards more reviews of code over time as the project has > >> > grown. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Gabriel Reid <[email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Josh (and others), > >> >> > >> >> I was wondering if you had any preferences on how we go about > handling > >> >> changes to the User Guide (and website content in general). Is there > a > >> >> preference to go with a review-then-commit workflow, or > >> >> commit-then-review (or something else)? > >> >> > >> >> I'm assuming that at this point that there won't be any huge major > >> >> additions to it, but I figure it wouldn't be bad to have a general > >> >> agreement on how we want to handle editing it. FWIW, up until now the > >> >> (very minor) changes I've made have just been going straight in > >> >> without any review. > >> >> > >> >> - Gabriel > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Director of Data Science > >> > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> > >> > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Director of Data Science > > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> > > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills> > -- Director of Data Science Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
