This is valuable addition. Thanks Pei!
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Chen, Pei <[email protected]>wrote: > Added: > http://ctakes.apache.org/relatedresources.html > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:04 AM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > > ctakes.apache.org ? > > > > +1 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (398J) > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:54 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > > ctakes.apache.org ? > > > > +1 makes total sense, should be a great way to show off the project. > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > ++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: [email protected] > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > ++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of > > Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > ++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: <Chen>, Pei <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 7:45 PM > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > > ctakes.apache.org ? > > > > >+1 for a Related Resources with public links. > > >There have been a couple of recently accepted/published papers that can > > >illustrate what could be done with cTAKES which would fit nicely into > > >that page... > > >________________________________________ > > >From: Girivaraprasad Nambari [[email protected]] > > >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:15 PM > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > > >ctakes.apache.org ? > > > > > >I think it would be good to have a page on Wiki with title something > > >like "Related resources" (Apache Mahout has similar page I guess) and > > >add relevant "public" links here. I know we can't pull everything to > > >this page, but whatever core team thinks are valuable at least (or) > > >referred while implementing the code. > > > > > >I think this page will give high level overview on what frameworks > > >developers need to be aware of while using ctakes. > > > > > >For example, we can add following links: > > > > > >https://code.google.com/p/uimafit/wiki/GettingStarted > > >http://knowtator.sourceforge.net/quickstart.shtml > > > > > >And some links related to "SVM" and "MaxEnt" related information > > >etc.,(Which were referred by original implementer). > > > > > >This way people who want to extend/add new features and referring > > >existing implementation will be able to go through these to get > > >understanding on what is happening inside ctakes. > > > > > >Thank you, > > >Giri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andy McMurry <[email protected]> > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Argument FOR: > > >> > > >> Videos can also be very educational for new users! > > >> For example, this cTAKES description by Guergana : > > >> https://vimeo.com/24829353 > > >> > > >> Publishing our slides or video -- for example recent the NLP > > >>presentations from the i2b2 user group -- gives folks a very real > > >>sense of the kinds of problems we are currently working on. > > >> A lot of people can't make it to these events. The slides are on the > > >>web anyway, just harder to find if you dont know already. > > >> > > >> Argument AGAINST: > > >> > > >> Sharing your ideas before they are published in a journal can be bad > > >>for academic credit! > > >> Make every effort to separate the scientific research from > > >>engineering product. > > >> There is little value in sharing an idea without an implementation > > >>anyway, this is already complicated enough with stable software. > > >> > > >> ~~~ > > >> I can see both perspectives. > > >> Curious what others think about this. > > >> > > >> --Andy > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
