Great. Since we have consensus I propose we organize the content by feature: sentence boundary , part if speech, smoking, ner, etc
That way a newcomer can find the papers that supports the features they need On Jul 8, 2013 11:58 AM, "Savova, Guergana" < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > There are already a number of publications in Publications and > Acknowledgements section in History. Of course, the content can be > re-organized. > --Guergana > > -----Original Message----- > From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:04 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mattmann, Chris A (398J) > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > +1 makes total sense, should be a great way to show off the project. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of > Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: <Chen>, Pei <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 7:45 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > >+1 for a Related Resources with public links. > >There have been a couple of recently accepted/published papers that can > >illustrate what could be done with cTAKES which would fit nicely into > >that page... > >________________________________________ > >From: Girivaraprasad Nambari [[email protected]] > >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:15 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > >ctakes.apache.org ? > > > >I think it would be good to have a page on Wiki with title something > >like "Related resources" (Apache Mahout has similar page I guess) and > >add relevant "public" links here. I know we can't pull everything to > >this page, but whatever core team thinks are valuable at least (or) > >referred while implementing the code. > > > >I think this page will give high level overview on what frameworks > >developers need to be aware of while using ctakes. > > > >For example, we can add following links: > > > >https://code.google.com/p/uimafit/wiki/GettingStarted > >http://knowtator.sourceforge.net/quickstart.shtml > > > >And some links related to "SVM" and "MaxEnt" related information > >etc.,(Which were referred by original implementer). > > > >This way people who want to extend/add new features and referring > >existing implementation will be able to go through these to get > >understanding on what is happening inside ctakes. > > > >Thank you, > >Giri > > > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andy McMurry <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> Argument FOR: > >> > >> Videos can also be very educational for new users! > >> For example, this cTAKES description by Guergana : > >> https://vimeo.com/24829353 > >> > >> Publishing our slides or video -- for example recent the NLP > >>presentations from the i2b2 user group -- gives folks a very real > >>sense of the kinds of problems we are currently working on. > >> A lot of people can't make it to these events. The slides are on the > >>web anyway, just harder to find if you dont know already. > >> > >> Argument AGAINST: > >> > >> Sharing your ideas before they are published in a journal can be bad > >>for academic credit! > >> Make every effort to separate the scientific research from > >>engineering product. > >> There is little value in sharing an idea without an implementation > >>anyway, this is already complicated enough with stable software. > >> > >> ~~~ > >> I can see both perspectives. > >> Curious what others think about this. > >> > >> --Andy > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
