Seems like we need to need to put "family history" somewhere on an Apache cTAKES page.
"ctakes" family history site:apache.org Doesn't give very satisfactory results. No wonder that when the 'site' parameter is left off, a search for "ctakes" family history doesn't show apache ctakes at the top -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of amcmurry Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: NCI references out of date FYI: my google search was for "ctakes" family history This isn't an urgent issue, but these things can linger. On the last Open Source project I was on (still running) -- the multiple "front door" issue confused a lot of newcomers On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:09 AM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a NOTE in the Introduction of the 2.5 page. > It references Apache cTAKES as incubating though. And apparently is not > prominent enough. I will update that and find a way to make it more prominent. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Bleeker, Troy C. > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: NCI references out of date > > I agree that we should continue to change any other existing "front door" or > mechanism that we know of that points to the current cTAKES. The primary > goal, as you say, would be to get new users (or old ones coming back) to the > right place within just a few clicks. > Troy > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Andy McMurry > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: NCI references out of date > > HI Troy et al: > > I noticed that the NCI is still referring to cTakes 2.5. > > Should we > A) update the other sites with each new cTakes version > B) redirect to apache ctakes > > https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/VKC/cTAKES+2.5 > > I dont mean to harp on this issue, but it is the front door that I keep > finding via Google searches for cTakes content. > Which means many of our users may still be going to these other sites and > getting stale info. > > Thoughts? Votes? > > PS: we have a new cTakes paper on de-identification about to be published any > day now. > WIll post when link is live.
