Thanks, Matthew and Gandhi. I look into the docker solution.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Vita <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It's not using the REST service, but this docker solution allows for
> distributed queuing: https://github.com/tmills/ctakes-docker
>
> This may help with your large text volumes.
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 9:02 AM Gandhi Rajan Natarajan <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Even if you send it in batch, the processing will be sequential I guess.
> > You may have to run multiple instances of REST service to process huge
> > volume of records.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gandhi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zakir Saifi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 4:23 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Batching Queries in Ctakes Web Rest
> >
> > I am using ctakesRestService to process unstructured clinical text. I
> have
> > a long list of records which I want to be structured. On average Ctakes
> > service for me is taking 3.6 seconds to process a record. I want to
> *batch
> > this process* in order to reduce time. Is there any way in which I can
> sent
> > number of queries to the ctakes web rest service in batch and get the
> > appropriate result from it. My Ctakes version is 4.0.1. I have also
> changed
> > the default piper file and added other annotators for extracting more
> > information like BackwardsTimeAnnotator, DocTimeRelAnnotator etc.
> > ​
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed.
> > If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute
> > or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system manager by email
> > immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this
> > e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> > notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
> > reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and
> > against the law.
> >
>

Reply via email to