Sorry Sean. I would love to do this but my old setup is all gone with my previous organization. Gotta do a fresh setup in my personal machine all over again. Sorry about that.
On Friday, January 11, 2019, Finan, Sean <sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Sana, > > This might be related to > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-450?filter= > -5&jql=project%20%3D%20CTAKES%20AND%20resolution%20%3D% > 20Unresolved%20AND%20%22Attachment%20count%22%20%3C%3D%20%222%22%20AND%20% > 22Attachment%20count%22%20%3E%3D%20%221%22%20order%20by% > 20priority%20DESC%2Cupdated%20DESC > > If anybody has time to test and approve the patch attached to that tar > please let me know so that it can be checked in. > > Thanks, > Sean > ________________________________________ > From: Sana Riaz <sana.r...@xflowresearch.com> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 5:33 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: AggregateCdaUmlsprocessor only annotates last section of CDA > document [EXTERNAL] > > Hi, > I am trying to process CDA documents with AggregateCdaUMLSProcessor.xml > descriptor (clinical-pipeline). The cda document includes sections like > problems, medications, allergies, tests etc. In the plain_view, all these > section are visible in CVD but all the annotations extracted by > AggregateCdaUMLSProcessor are only on last section. i.e. there's no > annotation on the medications or problems. > > I've looked into CdaCasInitializer output , and it only passes one segment > (the last one) so all the other annotators only process on that. In > addition to that, every section's id (including last) is assigned null as > [start section id="null"] > .... > [end section id="null"] > > Do i have to assign section id's myself? Any suggestion would be very > helpful. > > Warm Regards, > > Sana Riaz > -- Regards, Gandhi "The best way to find urself is to lose urself in the service of others !!!"
