+1 also (if it hasn't been decided yet.) Glen
bimargulies wrote: > > I'm +1 for turning off 2.1 support. > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> Question for everyone..... >> >> What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the >> 2.1.x line? >> >> 2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should >> have >> had plenty of time to migrate. 2.2.x is generally a simple migration >> from >> 2.1.x. I think most of the other major open source projects that were >> tracking 2.1.x have already moved onto 2.2.x. ServiceMix, Camel, JBoss, >> etc... The remaining projects that are using 2.1.x seem to be stuck >> on >> a >> particular version (like Mule stuck on 2.1.3) and not "tracking" the >> fixes >> anyway. >> >> The main migration issue from 2.1.x to 2.2.x is the JAX-RS version (0.8 >> -> >> 1.0). However, we aren't fixing any of the JAX-RS issues on 2.1.x >> anyway. >> Thus, that's not a real reason. If you are using JAX-RS, you definitely >> want >> the compliant implementation in 2.2. >> >> Anyway, making 2.1.9 the end of the line should then make it such that >> when >> 2.3 is ready (hopefully in Q1), we can just keep 2 fixes branches active. >> >> Thoughts? Comments? >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> dk...@apache.org >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-dropping-support-for-2.1.x......-tp26373514p26545380.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
