On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote: > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF > > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a > > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache > > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 > > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are > > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact > > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think > > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS > > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. > > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just > hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating > this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 > > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to > attach a patch to that Jira issue.
Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/ and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its "ready". The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was more or less ready. THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in- jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed as well. Dan > > Rick > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks > >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see > >> if they would be interested. > >> > >> +1 from me. > >> > >> -- dims > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > >> > >> <nlgal...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> +1 from me Bryant. > >>> > >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I > >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming > >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. > >>> > >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. > >>> > >>> -Nick > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR > >>> spec from geronimo? :) > >>> > >>> Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM > >>> > >>> Please respond to > >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >>> To > >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>> cc > >>> > >>> Subject > >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR > >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) > >>> > >>> -- dims > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<bryant....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo > >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider > >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven > >>>> repository that's Apache licensed. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > >> > >> -- > >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
