Hi I've attached a patch to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2972 to do with returning a fault in case of ReplyTo address set to none. It appears 202 status is expected but a related JAXWS TCK test actually expects a fault. CXF treats a none address as a generic (nearly as an anonymous) address which is not a problem in cases when a restriction is applied that only non-anonymous addresses are expected. But if an anonymous address is expected then treating none as if was an anonymous address is problematic. However, it does seem to me now that indeed returning 202 seems equally problematic. Why would anyone ever event want to emulate a oneway request by setting a reply to address to none and then executing a two way request ? Probably JAXWS TCK is correct here after all on expecting a fault instead. Let me know if you have any concerns re the proposed fix, I reckon it's ok to go cheers, Sergey
