On Friday 03 September 2010 12:13:48 pm Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi > > I've attached a patch to > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2972 > > to do with returning a fault in case of ReplyTo address set to none. > It appears 202 status is expected but a related JAXWS TCK test actually > expects a fault. > > CXF treats a none address as a generic (nearly as an anonymous) address > which is not a problem > in cases when a restriction is applied that only non-anonymous addresses > are expected. > > But if an anonymous address is expected then treating none as if was an > anonymous address is problematic. > > However, it does seem to me now that indeed returning 202 seems equally > problematic. Why would anyone ever event want to emulate a oneway request > by setting a reply to address to none and then executing a two way request > ? Probably JAXWS TCK is correct here after all on expecting a fault > instead. > > Let me know if you have any concerns re the proposed fix, I reckon it's ok > to go The ONLY use case I can think of is if the client really doesn't care about the response at all, fault or not. But I really think it's a relatively bogus use case so your fix is fine by me.
-- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
