Dan, as an ASF member, are you allowed to send an email asking if we can copy this down into svn?
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: > > On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not really sure >> what to do. :-( >> >> One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac >> TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or something?) I >> could throw them up on my personal server for now. Reconfigure the examples >> to then just use the local server. That would work for WS-Sec, and WS-SC >> tests, but not the Trust due to the need for the MS STS. With Colm's >> proposal this morning, we could have an STS as well. > Thanks Dan for this kind suggestion. > But put the wsdl in a personal server still make cxf example rely on some > outside servers, though I believe your server must be more stable than the MS > one :-), I prefer that cxf examples can run standalone. >> >> That said, the above is a bit of work and I'm not sure how worth it that >> would >> be at this point. If we're going to to all that work, it's probably just >> better to create a couple new "simpler" samples that show the various >> security >> options. For example, if we pull in the STS, a good example that uses that >> to >> show using SAML to secure a service or similar might be a bit more useful >> than >> the interopfest things that just test a bunch of policies. > I like the idea that create a couple new "simpler" samples that show the > various security options, as cxf could have a better STS as well soon. > How about we exclude ws_security/interopfest example from kit for now and we > can add more useful security related examples later on. > > Regards > Freeman >> >> Dan >> >> >> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:18:56 AM Freeman Fang wrote: >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> Due to the Microsoft WCF security related server down for quite a >>> while(probably over a year and I'm not sure if they can come back >>> again), so the ws_security/interopfest examples shipped with kit >>> doesn't work, I know that wssec10, wssec11, and wssc samples in >>> samples/ws_security/interopfest have local server, but those local >>> server also need download wsdl(I don't think we can ship those wsdls >>> for license reason) during runtime from Microsoft WCF server, so if >>> Microsoft WCF server is down, even local server doesn't work. >>> >>> Currently we have a NOTES like >>> IMPORTANT NOTE: since these samples rely on the external services >>> that are provided >>> by Microsoft, they may or may not run or even build reliably if the >>> services are down >>> or have been changed. >>> >>> But if Microsoft WCF server never come back, it means those examples >>> will never work again, so it's not a good experience for end user. >>> Should we contact Microsoft to ask the server back(:-))? Should we >>> remove those examples? Or should we just leave it as is? >>> >>> Any feedback is appreciated. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Freeman >>> >>> --------------------------------------------- >>> Freeman Fang >>> >>> FuseSource >>> Email:ff...@fusesource.com >>> Web: fusesource.com >>> Twitter: freemanfang >>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> dk...@apache.org >> http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > --------------------------------------------- > Freeman Fang > > FuseSource > Email:ff...@fusesource.com > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > >
