OK. I'll drop the minimal bundle but keep the jaxrs. That works for me. :-)
Dan On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 04:39:30 PM Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi Dan > > On 28/03/12 16:16, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Quick question: > > Are the jaxrs and minimal bundles still needed for 2.6.0? With the new > > little bundles, neither really makes any sense anymore. > > > > The minimal bundle is far from minimal (it's grown fairly large). > > Folks > > needed a more minimal environment are better just grabbing the > > individual > > bundles of just the things they need. > > Definitely +1 to dropping the minimal bundle, it was introduced > originally to minimize DOSGi CXF single bundle distributions but it > won't be needed when DOSGi CXF gets updated to CXF 2.6.0 > > > Likewise, the jaxrs bundle is likely better served with the smaller > > bundles. > It does not give us much now in Karaf with its features easily pulling > in various smaller bundles together but dropping it might make it more > difficult for some users to migrate to CXF 2.6.0 in cases they depend > upon it for the apps deployed into non-Karaf based OSGI containers (I > expect some users do it). > > > The "all" bundle does have use outside of OSGi since that is the main > > jar we stick in lib. I'm just wondering if it make sense to keep > > maintaining the other two. > > I guess I'd not mind to keep the cxf jaxrs in the 2.6.x main branch if > possible till 2.7 for example. But I recognize it is mostly redundant. > I'll try to play with some of the demos and migrate them to depending > on smaller bundles, if it simply a matter of updating the maven deps > then it would be easy to migrate :-) > > Cheers, Sergey > > > Thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
