+1. Colm.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It makes sense. >> +1 for it. >> >> >> On 4/25/12 2:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> >>> Just wanted to open up a discussion about dropping support for 2.3.x. >>> 2.3.0 was release over 18 months ago. Since then, 2.4.x was released >>> over a >>> year ago and 2.5.x 6 months ago. (and 2.6 last week). Thus, there has >>> been plenty of opportunity (a whole year) for people to upgrade to newer >>> versions. >>> >>> Right now, we have 4 branches we're supporting (2.6(trunk)/2.5/2.4/2.3) >>> and >>> we're likely soon going to make a 2.6 branch and open up trunk for 2.7 >>> work >>> adding yet another one. Dropping 2.3 will simplify things a bit for us. >>> >>> The major "con" to it is that there are still a lot of folks using 2.3.x. >>> According the Nexus stats of central, last month, 2.3.3 was still the >>> second >>> most downloaded version. (next to 2.5.2) However, if they are on 2.3.3 >>> which was released over a year ago, they haven't been grabbing the latest >>> patches anyway so producing more patches won't really matter to them. >>> >>> In any case, I'm think about doing one more 2.3.x release (2.3.11) which >>> would be announced as the end of the 2.3.x line. Obviously if any >>> security issues pop up we can push another release in the future, but >>> basically end the regular patch releases. >>> >>> Any objections or other thoughts? >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Willem >> ------------------------------**---- >> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com >> FuseSource >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com >> Blog: >> http://willemjiang.blogspot.**com<http://willemjiang.blogspot.com>(English) >> http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese) >> Twitter: willemjiang >> Weibo: willemjiang >> -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
