We're getting close to April which normally would be the next release (2.8).   
However, looking things over, I'm not sure it makes sense at this time.    
Looking at trunk, the only major change (which is admittedly a big one), is 
updating the JAX-RS 2.0 stuff from m10  to the RC level.   However, it's not 
complete yet.   Almost everything else has been back ported to 2.7.x.   The 
other major chunk of work that is happening is on the wss4j2 branch, but that 
isn't ready for for release yet either.   (and has some backwards compat issues 
to resolve if it would go on a 2.x line)

According to the agreements Apache has with Oracle, we really cannot "release" 
code that doesn't pass the TCK (which the 2.0 works would not).   Technically, 
we should not have released 2.7.0 as a release.  We can release things like 
"tech previews" or "beta" or similar, but not a full release.   Since we are 
working on trying to renew the agreements, Oracle is paying attention to us 
pretty closely right now.

So, what am I getting at?   In order to release 2.8 in a few weeks, we'd either 
need to back out all the JAX-RS 2.0 stuff to 1.1 level OR everyone jump in full 
force and get it to pass the TCK.   I really don't see either happening.   
Backing out to 1.1 would be silly and the 2.0 TCK stuff is a ton of work.   
Thus, my suggestion would be to skip a big release this April and concentrate 
on bigger things for our Oct/Nov release.  Possibly make that a CXF 3.0 release 
instead of 2.8 where we can clean up some stuff, break a few things (like 
change the couple API's that currently force WSDL4J on JAX-RS users), etc…    
We can incorporate the WSS4J2 changes as part of this as well.    If we go this 
route, we could likely start a series of "beta" releases or similar in June or 
so to get people looking at it and testing with it.

Any thoughts?

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to