Hi Sergey, I'm not sure CXF-5439 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5439> is a really great idea. For me all CXF components should be just annotated with @javax.inject.Named and then injected using @javax.inject.Inject or @javax.annotation.Resource. I prefer to use a well established standards instead of multiplying annotations - but maybe I am not aware of some limitations, issue you mentioned could solve.
Anyway, my solution uses only javax.inject annotations and it works pretty well. I will file the jira issue soon (probably not today), and it should be clear then. Cheers, Przemyslaw On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Sergey Beryozkin [via CXF] < ml-node+s547215n5737565...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi > > I added a prototype to the JAX-RS frontend, > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/rt/frontend/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jaxrs/spring/SpringResourceServer.java > > (based on the code fragment from Vladimir Kulev) > > I think the similar thing can be done for all frontends indeed > > We probably should get > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5439 > > fixed first > > Sergey > > > On 09/12/13 14:13, Christian Schneider wrote: > > > We have some factory classes but they are often not as convenient to use > > as the namespaces. > > > > In any case it would be interesting to see what you did. Can you open a > > jira and attach your code as a patch? > > If it is just a few lines you can also just paste the code or point to a > > github repo or similar. > > > > Christian > > > > On 09.12.2013 15:05, pbielicki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> in order to integrate CXF with Spring developers need to go through an > >> XML > >> file, right (i.e. > >> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/writing-a-service-with-spring.html)? > >> > >> Is it possible out-of-the box to integrate CXF with Spring using > >> annotation-driven context configuration? I am talking about > >> @org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration and > >> @org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan annotations > >> ( > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.2.x/javadoc-api/org/springframework/context/annotation/Configuration.html). > > >> > >> Are they supported by CXF integration? > >> > >> The goal is to avoid any XML configuration. > >> > >> If it's not part of CXF I may help because I just implemented such > >> integration (few lines of code, really), and I find it pretty useful. > >> > >> Please let me know what you think? I wanted to open a JIRA issue > straight > >> away but I prefer to ask you before. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Przemyslaw Bielicki > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Spring-integration-using-Configuration-ComponentScan-annotations-tp5737561.html > >> > >> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > -- > Sergey Beryozkin > > Talend Community Coders > http://coders.talend.com/ > > Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Spring-integration-using-Configuration-ComponentScan-annotations-tp5737561p5737565.html > To unsubscribe from Spring integration using @Configuration & > @ComponentScan annotations, click > here<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5737561&code=cGJpZWxpY2tpQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1NzM3NTYxfC0xODU3NDYzNDAz> > . > NAML<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >
