I see,

maybe something doesn't hurting much CXF would be to add a flag in the
primitive provider. This way users could at least configure it to go back
to the previous behavior.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-05-06 10:54 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Romain
>
> Looks like you have a very nice set of tests which is impressive :-)
>
> That was a 'side-effect' of getting a spec requirement enforced. It is
> about  section 4.2.6,
> "java.lang.Boolean , java.lang.Character , java.lang.Number Only for
> text/plain"
>
> Personally I think it is too restrictive but a TCK test is failing against
> CXF right now, which is partially related to this requirement, hence this
> restriction needs to be enforced first for the final test solution to be
> done.
> Now that it is done it would be sensitive still continue to support
> Boolean/etc for any media type by default - we've had some troubles with
> the matching algorithm offering a more flexible sub-resource selection in
> some of the edge cases by default earlier...
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
>
> On 06/05/15 09:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.PrimitiveTextProvider#isSupported changed
>> when upgrading to also validate the media type.
>>
>> This sounds better but it is actually a regression since before it was
>> supported with any media type.
>>
>> A solution could be to have it twice in the writer chain, once with this
>> restriction at the beginning and another time without this restriction at
>> the end as a fallback.
>>
>> Not sure it does worth a fix but was a small side effect I experienced
>> upgrading.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to