+1 to keeping 3.2 on master until 3.2.1.  I also agree with declaring end
of support for 3.0.X (barring security vulnerabilities).

Good discussion!  Thanks!

Andy

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:14 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that keeping 3.2.x on master would make sense, at least till
> 3.2.1.  As Dennis pointed out,
> with Java 9 just a few weeks away we may branch off 3.2 later and work on
> 3.3 (master) to make it good
> Jigsaw citizen. Supporting only 3.1.x and dropping 3.0.x sounds
> reasonable, +1 to that.
>
> DK> Just wanted to start a quick discussion about 3.0.x.   We’ve
> historically done work on the master and then
> DK> supported two fixes branches.   With 3.2.0 being voted on now, I’m not
> sure if we would branch the 3.2.x-fixes
> DK> branch immediately or wait a bit (we have historically waited a bit).
>  Are there major changes forthcoming that
> DK> would warrant targeting 3.3 sooner?   If not, I think I’d like to
> stick on master for at least one round of fixes just to stabilize the 3.2.0
> as users migrate.
>
> DK> In any case, we’ve now supported the 3.0.x series for 2 years, 4
> months.      Would it make sense to announce that
> DK> 3.0.15 will be the final scheduled release off that branch?   Maybe
> wait one more iteration?    We haven’t been back
> DK> porting much anyway.    I grabbed the “central download stats” from
> Nexus for the cxf-core module (pretty much any
> DK> usage of CXF requires that) just to get an idea of what is used.   The
> top 10 are:
>
> DK> 3.0.3   18%
> DK> 3.1.11  11%
> DK> 3.1.6   10%
> DK> 3.1.10  7%
> DK> 3.1.12  6%
> DK> 3.1.7   5%
> DK> 3.1.8   5%
> DK> 3.1.5   4%
> DK> 3.1.4   4%
> DK> 3.0.1   4%
>
>
> DK> As you can see, the only 3.0.x versions in the top 10 are 3.0.1 and
> 3.0.3.  Since they are both ancient, I doubt
> DK> anyone using them is planning on upgrading to new 3.0.x versions
> anyway.   The good news is that the 3 latest 3.1.x
> DK> versions are in the top 5.  Shows that the 3.1.x folks are keeping up
> to date.    The last two 3.0.x releases (.13 and .14) are numbers 24 and 23
> on the list.
>
> DK> Anway, curious as to peoples thoughts….
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to