I've created a jakarta branch a long time ago.
Should all be JakartaEE8 level. But might miss some specs still - it's work in 
progress.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/jakarta/

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 23.12.2019 um 10:25 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> time flies, I haven't found much time to work on CXF this year but would love 
> to get these changes done. Other projects (e.g. Spring and Hibernate 
> Validator) already integrated the Jakarta changes, this makes it a bit easier 
> for us. Locally it works quite well for me apart from the OSGi mess that I'm 
> unable to solve.
> 
> I've just asked on the SM list for a release of SAAJ 1.4 spec bundle. 
> Hopefully this will be the missing piece in the puzzle (as discussed in 
> CXF-7910)...
> 
> Best,
> Dennis
> 
> On 2019/01/11 00:34:52, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> I will also take a look at the OSGi issues if not done yet.
>> -------------
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>> 
>> Red Hat, Inc. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 11, 2019, at 2:59 AM, Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Dennis,
>>> 
>>> I will take a look tonight if no one does it before me. Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>>   Andriy Redko
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 10:51 AM Dennis Kieselhorst <m...@dekies.de wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let's focus on JAX-WS and JAX-RS (along with JAXB) for 3.3.0 as those
>>>>>> are the main implementations that we are offering. Everything else can
>>>>>> be done for 3.4.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> +1, assuming the JAX-WS upgrade is seamless. JAX-RS is already done
>>>> right?
>>>>> Then let's use a single version of JAXB for both JDK8 + 11.
>>>> 
>>>> Well relatively seamless. Can anyone support solving the OSGi issues?
>>>> I've created branch
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/CXF-7910_jakarta_jaxws-api for it.
>>>> 
>>>>>> I also agree that we should release soon (maybe next week?) and avoid
>>>>>> another delay.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Yep let's tentatively target a vote at the end of next week?
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Dennis
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to