Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3. Colm.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4 > > @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance we could have a WSS4J 3.0.3 release soon? > > Thanks! > Freeman > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> just for your information, the PR (https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660) >> requires version of wss4f to be 3.0.3 (to contain >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-709) >> >> Best regards, >> Jiri >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:53 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks, great to hear that, Andriy. >> > >> > It would be great if we could get >> > https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660 merged in some form before the >> > release. >> > The main motivation is to be able to run CXF on FIPS-enabled systems. If >> > the customized algo suite, that the PR proposes, is questionable, I'd be >> > also fine with introducing a couple of new suites with fixed >> > non-standard names, like already done in the past for fixing CVEs. It >> > would be nice to hear other community members' thoughts. >> > >> > Thanks again, >> > >> > -- Peter >> > >> > On 13/02/2024 02:35, Andriy Redko wrote: >> > > Hi Peter, >> > > >> > > Thanks a lot for reminding, I belive we are long overdue on that, @Dan, >> > @Colm >> > > may need your help please preparing the next release train (or any >> > objection folks)? >> > > Thank you! >> > > >> > > Best Regards, >> > > Andriy Redko >> > > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> we are preparing Quarkus CXF to release it for Quarkus 3.8 which is >> > going to be a LTS (Long Term Support) release. >> > >> I wonder whether we could count on getting CXF 4.0.4 by February 21st >> > to be able to use it in that release? >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> -- Peter >> > > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> >> Senior Software Engineer >> Red Hat Fuse
