olabusayoT commented on a change in pull request #273: WIP: Add User Defined 
Functions Capability
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/273#discussion_r331629444
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
daffodil-test/src/test/java/org/goodudfs/example/StringFunctions/StringFunctionsProvider.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+package org.goodudfs.example.StringFunctions;
+
+import org.apache.daffodil.udf.*;
+
+public class StringFunctionsProvider extends UDFunctionProvider {
+       public StringFunctionsProvider() {
+               super.setFunctionClasses( new Class<?>[] { Replace.class, 
Compare.class } );
+       }
+
+       public Object lookupFunctionClass(String namespace, String name) {
+               Object functionClass = null;
+
+               String nn = String.join("_", namespace, name);
+
+               switch (nn) {
+               case "com.ext.UDFunction.StringFunctions_replace":
 
 Review comment:
   So If we go the static members route, we can use reflection to get the 
fields like we do for the annotations. Then do the same checks we do for the 
annotated fields. So if you mean schema compile time, we can totally check that 
it exists.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to