mbeckerle commented on a change in pull request #273: WIP: Add User Defined 
Functions Capability
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/273#discussion_r336537248
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
daffodil-runtime1/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/dpath/UserDefinedFunctionBase.scala
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.daffodil.dpath
+
+import org.apache.daffodil.exceptions.Assert
+import java.lang.reflect.Method
+import org.apache.daffodil.udf.UserDefinedFunction
+
+/**
+ * Both the evaluate method and the User Defined Function instance are passed 
in, as both are needed by the Method.invoke
+ * function.
+ */
+case class UserDefinedFunctionCall(recipes: List[CompiledDPath], 
userDefinedFunction: UserDefinedFunction, evaluateFxn: Method)
+  extends FNArgsList(recipes) {
+  override def computeValue(values: List[Any], dstate: DState) = {
+    val jValues = values.map { _.asInstanceOf[Object] }
+    val res = evaluateFxn.invoke(userDefinedFunction, jValues: _*)
 
 Review comment:
   Expression evaluation is always surrounded by a try/catch which catches and 
converts things to PEs for you, so you don't need to reimplement that logic. 
   
   What you do need to do is make sure the diagnostic is specific enough to 
enable the user to fix the problem, should it propagate all the way back up to 
top level and halt the parse. 
   
   If you just allowed exceptions to propagate and didn't catch them at all, I 
think you'd get a PE that would say something like IllegalArgumentException, 
and give the file and line number of the whole expression that the UDF call 
appeared in. We want to be more specific than that. So I would try  catch, 
encapsulate as a PE and re-throw that. 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to