Does the project wish to add these repositories to clc.diversity.apache.org? If so then send an email to d...@diversity.apache.org
> On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > > I opened a ticket with INFRA and this has been completed. The master > branch has been renamed to 'main' for the following repos: > > https://github.com/apache/daffodil > https://github.com/apache/daffodil-site > https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode > https://github.com/apache/daffodil-schema.g8 > > To update your local master branch to track the ain branch, you can run > the following updates if each of your local clones. > > git branch -m master main > git fetch asf > git branch -u asf/main main > > If you'd like your forked repo to match, you can go to your forked repo > on GitHub, click Settings > click Branches > click the pencil icon next > to master > enter main > Click Rename branch. > > I'll update our wiki and open a pull request to update places where we > still reference the master branch. > > - Steve > > > On 8/30/21 7:33 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: >> Apache just released the Conscious Language Checker: >> >> https://clc.diversity.apache.org/ >> >> Which scans repositories looking for potential issues in conscious >> language. The findings for our repos are here: >> >> https://clc.diversity.apache.org/analysis.html?project=daffodil.git >> >> https://clc.diversity.apache.org/analysis.html?project=daffodil-site.git >> >> All of these are easy to fix and I've opened DAFFODIL-2557 to take care >> of them. >> >> One change that I think requires some discussion/consensus is the use of >> the "master" branch name. Many projects have switched to an alternative, >> and I suggest we do the same. The two most common alternatives I've seen >> are "main" and "develop", which I think "main" being more common. Many >> Apache projects now use this, this is now the default branch for new >> GitHub repos, and I believe git is planning to make the change as well. >> >> So I suggest we switch to "main" as well. >> >> Any thoughts on "main" vs "develop", or any other alternatives? >> >> - Steve >> >
