Looks like the Conscious Language Checker scans are now opt-in.

Adding our repos to the scans doesn't seem unreasonable to me,
especially since when I saw the scan a few days ago there were very few
findings, and I've opened some PR's to remove most of them. There will
likely continue to be false positives from time to time, but considering
this code base represents many years of development, and there were only
20 or so findings, I'd guess it will require a pretty small effort to
keep up with it.

So, I suggest that we opt-in to continue these scans. If there's no
objections, I'll send an email as Dave suggests and add us back to the
scanner.

Any objections/concerns?

- Steve

On 9/2/21 1:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Does the project wish to add these repositories to clc.diversity.apache.org? 
> If so then send an email to d...@diversity.apache.org
> 
> 
>> On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I opened a ticket with INFRA and this has been completed. The master
>> branch has been renamed to 'main' for the following repos:
>>
>>  https://github.com/apache/daffodil
>>  https://github.com/apache/daffodil-site
>>  https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode
>>  https://github.com/apache/daffodil-schema.g8
>>
>> To update your local master branch to track the ain branch, you can run
>> the following updates if each of your local clones.
>>
>>  git branch -m master main
>>  git fetch asf
>>  git branch -u asf/main main
>>
>> If you'd like your forked repo to match, you can go to your forked repo
>> on GitHub, click Settings > click Branches > click the pencil icon next
>> to master > enter main > Click Rename branch.
>>
>> I'll update our wiki and open a pull request to update places where we
>> still reference the master branch.
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>>
>> On 8/30/21 7:33 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>>> Apache just released the Conscious Language Checker:
>>>
>>>  https://clc.diversity.apache.org/
>>>
>>> Which scans repositories looking for potential issues in conscious
>>> language. The findings for our repos are here:
>>>
>>>  https://clc.diversity.apache.org/analysis.html?project=daffodil.git
>>>
>>>  https://clc.diversity.apache.org/analysis.html?project=daffodil-site.git
>>>
>>> All of these are easy to fix and I've opened DAFFODIL-2557 to take care
>>> of them.
>>>
>>> One change that I think requires some discussion/consensus is the use of
>>> the "master" branch name. Many projects have switched to an alternative,
>>> and I suggest we do the same. The two most common alternatives I've seen
>>> are "main" and "develop", which I think "main" being more common. Many
>>> Apache projects now use this, this is now the default branch for new
>>> GitHub repos, and I believe git is planning to make the change as well.
>>>
>>> So I suggest we switch to "main" as well.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on "main" vs "develop", or any other alternatives?
>>>
>>> - Steve
>>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to