My apologies for not realizing this. Should I add a +1 to the vote thread or 
not since I declared it
closed? Would this release be okay to go with 2, and I will make sure to wait 
for 3 on the next
release? Again my apologies for that.

On 2022/08/22 15:42:22 "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" wrote:
> Agreed.  I think this vote went fine and Shane just needs to formally add his 
> +1 and name to make it pass.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 11:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: EXT: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil VS Code 1.1.0-rc2
> 
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of GE. Please validate the 
> sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may 
> not be safe.
> 
> This is correct.
> 
> Though Shane is a PMC, so he can vote and count as the third. Should have 
> added an explicit +1 and added his name to the pass vote though.
> 
> - Steve
> 
> 
> On 8/22/22 11:22 AM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
> > I think you need a third PMC member vote. Releases should have 3 votes.
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:03 AM Shane Dell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> The VOTE to release Apache Daffodil VS Code 1.1.0-rc2 is now closed.
> >>
> >> The vote passes with:
> >>
> >> 2 binding +1
> >>
> >> The VOTE thread:
> >>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/m4tc565t84fo2mwpxvgyr4qqmg9tgv37
> >>
> >> The vote breakdown is:
> >>
> >> +1 Mike Beckerle (binding)
> >> +1 Steve Lawrence (binding)
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone who voted!
> >>
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to