Yeah, I'd suggest just adding a +1 to the VOTE thread with a note, just
so it's there if anyone ever looks back at the vote.
On 8/23/22 1:10 PM, Shane Dell wrote:
My apologies for not realizing this. Should I add a +1 to the vote thread or
not since I declared it
closed? Would this release be okay to go with 2, and I will make sure to wait
for 3 on the next
release? Again my apologies for that.
On 2022/08/22 15:42:22 "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" wrote:
Agreed. I think this vote went fine and Shane just needs to formally add his
+1 and name to make it pass.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 11:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXT: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil VS Code 1.1.0-rc2
WARNING: This email originated from outside of GE. Please validate the sender's
email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe.
This is correct.
Though Shane is a PMC, so he can vote and count as the third. Should have added
an explicit +1 and added his name to the pass vote though.
- Steve
On 8/22/22 11:22 AM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
I think you need a third PMC member vote. Releases should have 3 votes.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:03 AM Shane Dell <[email protected]> wrote:
The VOTE to release Apache Daffodil VS Code 1.1.0-rc2 is now closed.
The vote passes with:
2 binding +1
The VOTE thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/m4tc565t84fo2mwpxvgyr4qqmg9tgv37
The vote breakdown is:
+1 Mike Beckerle (binding)
+1 Steve Lawrence (binding)
Thanks to everyone who voted!
