Yeah, it looks good to me. I like it as is. Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney> [email protected] LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Sam Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me. I like the inclusion of non-code contributions as a path > to committer status as well. > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Russell Jurney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Something came up as we prepare DataFu for graduation. We haven't > > documented the process of nominating and approving new committers. From > the > > thread with Matt Hayes: > > > > > > > So far the process has been that I start a discussion in the private > list > > > when I think someone has made enough good contributions. If there's > good > > > feedback we vote. Anyone in the PPMC can initiate this; we just > haven't > > > documented it. > > > > > > A good example of a page that roughly works this way is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/ > Becoming+a+Committer > > > > What do folks think of using this as a template for our process? Any > > additions/edits people want? > > > > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney> > > [email protected] LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB > > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com > > >
