I also like it. I'm glad we have the community laison part, it's a good idea.
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:57 AM, Sam Shah <shah...@umich.edu> wrote:
Looks good to me. I corrected a couple typos.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Matthew Hayes <
matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Makes sense to me too regarding 12 months. I've written a draft document
> based on Fineract's and the discussion here. Please read and provide
> feedback.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68722904
>
> -Matt
>
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That makes sense to me. I say we should make it 12 months, even though it
> > is a suggestion.
> >
> > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> > russell.jur...@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB
> > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Eyal Allweil
> > > <eyal_allw...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > It looks good to me, too. But maybe we can make the
> > > inactivity-for-committer-removal
> > > > period longer than what is described in the Fineract model? (six
> months
> > > + four weeks notice)
> > > > That seems too short to me.
> > >
> > > The period may be whatever it is, but don't forget that merit at ASF
> > > doesn't
> > > expire. You can NOT unilaterally remove somebody's karma you can only
> > > reach out to that person and politely suggest a voluntary resignation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> > >
> >
>
