Thanks Roman. I fixed the conflicts in the report. Please take a look. Regarding your comments,
1) Having committers stay indefinitely makes sense to me. I'll update the wiki page. 2) Having PMC == committers also makes sense to me. I'll email all the current committers if they are willing to join the PMC. 3) I'll kick off a release vote soon with the sha512 fix. -Matt On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > There seems to be some merging artifacts on the report. Can you please > take look? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Matthew Hayes > <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Report updating: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2018 > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Matthew Hayes < > > matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Roman, > >> > >> I started a discussion > >> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > general/201710.mbox/browser> on > >> graduation in October. Some feedback was > >> > >> 1) concern over number of committers vs. number of PMC members (here > >> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > general/201710.mbox/%3Cop.y7jw80af4ntv07%40desktop-v42f38k%3E> > >> and here > >> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > general/201710.mbox/%3CCAOqetn_tXYM0MgZ_QUJg9xDiWUr2_ > VG5Msde96fmvBuBQriK-w%40mail.gmail.com%3E> > >> ) > >> 2) process for how committers are removed (here > >> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > general/201710.mbox/%3CCAFAMeYLxX5VD-t7Z4MQkKQ6y_ > M8BEdU975tjsUbAY7B5qVu3Zw%40mail.gmail.com%3E> > >> ) > >> 3) various website issues and an issue regarding sha512 checksum > extension > >> (here > >> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > general/201710.mbox/%3CCAOGo0VZN4mLw-eS-Oz8W1hVhS70Y_ > BwwikJjRi9Sx3n0s8sFMg%40mail.gmail.com%3E> > >> ) > >> > >> I don't know if any action is required for #2; this was based on > >> Fineract's process, which seemed reasonable to us. Do committers > usually > >> remain indefinitely? I don't have a strong opinion either way. > >> > >> For #1, I thought from previous discussions that having 4 PMC members > was > >> sufficient. John said 5 members was the bare minimum. I'm sure if we > >> asked more committers would be willing to join the PMC. Mike suggested > >> asking who would like to remain a committer going forward after > >> graduation. Generally, immediately after graduation should the > committer > >> list equal the PMC list? i.e. should we ask who would like to remain as > >> both a committer and and PMC member? > >> > >> For #3, most of the issues raised with the website have been fixed. > Most > >> of the Whimsy checks for DataFu > >> <https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/datafu> are now green, aside > from > >> Events and Image, which don't seem to pass for anyone, and License, > which > >> seems like an invalid check to me. I'm working on addressing the > remaining > >> issues for #3. The sha512 issue requires a new release, which we > should do > >> anyways. > >> > >> -Matt > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Ping! > >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > ro...@shaposhnik.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi! > >>> > > >>> > I know I've been kind of absent lately, but what's > >>> > the current thinking on graduation? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Roman. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> > From: <johndam...@apache.org> > >>> > Date: Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 2:49 PM > >>> > Subject: Podling Report Reminder - January 2018 > >>> > To: dev@datafu.incubator.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Dear podling, > >>> > > >>> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > >>> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time > to > >>> > prepare your quarterly board report. > >>> > > >>> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 January 2018, 10:30 am > PDT. > >>> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC > >>> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 > weeks > >>> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and > >>> > submission (Wed, January 03). > >>> > > >>> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator > >>> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the > >>> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the > board > >>> > meeting. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > > >>> > The Apache Incubator PMC > >>> > > >>> > Submitting your Report > >>> > > >>> > ---------------------- > >>> > > >>> > Your report should contain the following: > >>> > > >>> > * Your project name > >>> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge > of > >>> > the project or necessarily of its field > >>> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move > >>> > towards graduation. > >>> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need > to be > >>> > aware of > >>> > * How has the community developed since the last report > >>> > * How has the project developed since the last report. > >>> > * How does the podling rate their own maturity. > >>> > > >>> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > >>> > > >>> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2018 > >>> > > >>> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little > before > >>> > this page is created from a template. > >>> > > >>> > Mentors > >>> > ------- > >>> > > >>> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off > on > >>> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > >>> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > >>> > for the Incubator PMC. > >>> > > >>> > Incubator PMC > >>> > >> > >> >
