On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:16 -0500, Doug Davis wrote:
>   it can't hurt to add that sentence.

I am all for adding that sentence.

>   I actually ran into that recently
> and was bugged that we needed a resourceURI at all for XML - I know that's
> the price we pay for using the same root element for all collections, but
> bleck!  :-)   Maybe for v2 we can convince folks (Gil) to use a
> collection-specific root element name.

I am actually fine with the way things are now - I was pleasantly
surprised how easy it was to dispatch to the correct model class from
the response only.

David


Reply via email to