Sure the data is there but its inconsistent from an XML perspective to only have one class with a ResourceURI, while all of the others use the root xml NS/name for that purpose. But I guess it depends on whether your model has one collection class or multiple.
thanks -Doug ________________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | [email protected] The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. From: David Lutterkort <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS Date: 11/09/2012 02:52 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] CIMI: toplevel collections must have a resourceURI attr in XML On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:16 -0500, Doug Davis wrote: > it can't hurt to add that sentence. I am all for adding that sentence. > I actually ran into that recently > and was bugged that we needed a resourceURI at all for XML - I know that's > the price we pay for using the same root element for all collections, but > bleck! :-) Maybe for v2 we can convince folks (Gil) to use a > collection-specific root element name. I am actually fine with the way things are now - I was pleasantly surprised how easy it was to dispatch to the correct model class from the response only. David
