Hm, I'll have to go back to the code to see what was done.

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com> wrote:

> The Seam 2 converter worked on any entity class, you just had to provide
> it with a reference to the EntityManager.
>
> On 18 Aug 2013, at 05:16, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The problem with a generic JSF converter is that it has to be very dumb,
> or you have to use a certain kind of object.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    The Seam 3 converter went as generic as possible, it also kept things
> in the conversion (and should work fine in the request as a conversation is
> at least as long as a request). Depending on what state you're storing in
> the converter, you probably wouldn't want anything longer than the
> conversation due to memory issues.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    If memory serves correctly, the Seam 2 converter really only worked
> if you were using the EntityHome classes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    If you were to do anything similar to the Seam 2 converter you'd need
> to create some sort of object hierarchy the user would need to use, or try
> to perform some sort of generic magic with the criteria API, which is not
> the easiest of things to do.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    All that being said, I'd be happy to talk ideas out anyone may have.
> >
> >    —
> > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, hantsy <han...@yahoo.com.cn> wrote:
> >
> >> I have posted some content on JBoss.org forum before....the Seam3 faces
> >> object converter does not work well as the Seam 2 one.
> >> The Seam 3 only works in a conversation(the view is a conversation), and
> >> it also does not support @ManytoMany.
> >> The Seam2 version works perfectly....it works in request, conversation
> >> and other scopes...the better is when I used multi check box...it can
> >> deal with the Hibernate/JPA @ManyToMany relation correctly with any
> >> codes in the backend codes when I selected or unselected an option.
> >> Hantsy
> >> On 8/18/2013 05:42, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> In the meantime, if you're looking for a JSF converter, you can take a
> look at Omnifaces SelectItemsConverter [1].
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Adrian
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://showcase.omnifaces.org/converters/SelectItemsConverter
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> De : Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> >>> À : "dev@deltaspike.apache.org" <dev@deltaspike.apache.org>
> >>> Envoyé le : Vendredi 16 août 2013 12h39
> >>> Objet : Re: General Converter
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Florian!
> >>>
> >>> Not yet on our list. We are currently working on getting 0.5 out of
> the door (code reviews and testing against many containers)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please file a feature request in JIRA describing what this Seam2
> feature is about and why you like it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "i...@softwareentwicklung-hell.de" <
> i...@softwareentwicklung-hell.de>
> >>>> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> >>>> Cc:
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 August 2013, 14:35
> >>>> Subject: General Converter
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> is there a plan to implement Seam like general Converter like the Seam
> >>>> Faces Object converter? I know it is not really a cdi topic, but there
> >>>> is still a big gap between what Seam was providing and what DeltaSpike
> >>>> does.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks and Regards
> >>>> Florian
>
>


-- 
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

Reply via email to