I think 1.0 sounds great. Improving docs would be the best way to move deltaspike forward imo. My major concern right now is the windowId stuff. I like many want the functionality but struggles with dual ids (windowId & dsRid) a loading splash. Would love docs here that covers the different strategies and routes one can take.
cheers On 15 November 2013 14:31, Christian Kaltepoth <christ...@kaltepoth.de>wrote: > +1 for releasing 1.0 next > -1 for subreleases. This would be very confusing. > +1 for improving the documentation before the 1.0 release. This is IMHO > more important than examples. > > > 2013/11/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > Well if code is released it should be stable or explicitely in > > alpha/beta..maybe we should do subreleases for unstables modules > > Le 11 nov. 2013 18:43, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > > > > > Oki folks, txs 4 the feedback, all! > > > > > > > > > I'd say we should create the module-maturity-matrix.md first and then > we > > > might do the version bump. > > > Maybe something like green/blue/orange/red for mature / ready but still > > > needs a few features / ready but might change it's api still / work in > > > progress > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> > > > > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > > > > Cc: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > > > > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 18:25 > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0? > > > > > > > > +1 to move to 1.0. We have done the same thing with Apache Aries > moving > > > > Blueprint from 0.5 to 1.0 release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament > > > > <john.d.am...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > >> Yep, agreed. Users care about the version #. I would recommend > that > > > if we > > > >> could release a 1.0 based on the current code base + some > additional > > > bug > > > >> fixes we'll get huge wins. > > > >> > > > >> +1 to switching current to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi! > > > >> > > > > >> > In the last 2 months I did a few conference talks and smaller > > > >> > presentations (OpenBlend, W-JAX, ..) and always got the same > > > > questions: > > > >> > "it's only a 0.x version, so is it already stable? I > > > > don't like to use it > > > >> > in production with 0.x" > > > >> > > > > >> > And the actual answer is: "well, core, cdictrl, etc are stable > > > > since a > > > >> > long time, other modules are not yet 100% where we like them". > > > >> > > > > >> > The other fact is that we will never get all our modules 100% > > stable. > > > >> > Because new modules cannot be released with the same quality than > > > >> > established and well known and bugfixed modules. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thus I think we should rather introduce a kind of majurity-matrix > > for > > > >> > DeltaSpike. > > > >> > A simple list of modules and their majurity grade. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > By officially moving to 1.0 we would gain much more users. > > > >> > I personally do not care about numbers, but LOTS of users do! > > > >> > > > > >> > Wdyt? > > > >> > > > > >> > LieGrue, > > > >> > strub > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Charles Moulliard > > > > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > > > > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal >
