seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: > I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is > not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: >>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what >>> the new qualifier is. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S) >>>> >>>> -C >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api. >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand >>>>> <anto...@sabot-durand.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence >>>>> of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a >>>>>>écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >>>>>>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >>>>>>>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need >>>>>>>>> @Web?", >>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is >>>>>>>>> redudant: >>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it? >>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>
