yes but until now everybody seems ok if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if some change their vote, no? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-24 21:00 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: > As per OP email, it's only a proposed value. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no? >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: >>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is >>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: >>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what >>>>> the new qualifier is. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S) >>>>>> >>>>>> -C >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>> strub >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand >>>>>>> <anto...@sabot-durand.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage >>>>>>> co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a >>>>>>>>écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >>>>>>>>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >>>>>>>>>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need >>>>>>>>>>> @Web?", >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is >>>>>>>>>>> redudant: >>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it? >>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
